The Duchess of Sussex may be returning to Britain, but I do not believe she is remotely interested in returning to royal duties.
And why would she be?
Meghan has already experienced life as a full-time working member of the Royal Family. She knows what the job entails: the carefully choreographed engagements, the endless handshaking, the prescribed subjects, the neutral answers, the restricted wardrobe and the obligation to appear enthusiastic about whatever has been placed in the official diary that morning.
She also knows what it means to have almost every decision assessed—not merely by the public, but by courtiers, advisers, government officials, family members and a ferocious press corps waiting to interpret the slightest movement of an eyebrow.
I suspect Meghan is perfectly content with the life she has now.
She is not exactly a commoner. She remains Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, married to the King’s son and mother to Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, both of whom are in the direct line of succession to the British throne.
But she is also not obliged to put on a hat, pin a brooch to her lapel and open a leisure centre in Surrey because somebody at the Palace placed it in her diary six months earlier.
That is a rather enviable position.
Meghan can enjoy the historical identity, family connections and occasional grandeur that come with being a duchess without surrendering her professional independence. She can develop As Ever, produce television programmes, support causes of her choosing and—if the latest reports are correct—possibly return to acting.
The Duchess has reportedly been in discussions about appearing in a future season of Guy Ritchie’s Netflix series The Gentlemen. Nothing has been officially confirmed, and reports have disagreed about precisely how advanced those conversations may be. But the possibility alone tells us something important: Meghan appears to be contemplating an independent professional life in Britain, not a return to the royal rota.
A proper acting role would be fundamentally incompatible with life as a working royal.
It would not necessarily constitute a legal conflict of interest, but it would create an obvious institutional one. A senior working royal represents the monarch and, by extension, the British state. She cannot easily move from an official engagement undertaken on behalf of the Crown to a commercially financed television set, negotiate a salary with Netflix and promote a fictional series around the world.
Every script would be scrutinised. Every producer would be accused of exploiting her title. Every storyline would be examined for hidden references to the Royal Family. The Palace would inevitably face questions about whether it had approved the project.
It would be completely unworkable.
That does not mean royals have never appeared on television or in films.
Queen Elizabeth famously appeared with Daniel Craig’s James Bond in the opening sequence of the 2012 London Olympics. She later shared tea with Paddington Bear for her Platinum Jubilee. King Charles, when he was Prince of Wales, appeared briefly in Coronation Street. Sarah Ferguson popped up in an episode of Friends, while Princess Beatrice had a small, non-speaking appearance as a lady-in-waiting in The Young Victoria.
There is even a member of the extended Royal Family who has maintained a genuine acting career. Sophie Winkleman, known formally as Lady Frederick Windsor since marrying the son of Prince and Princess Michael of Kent, has continued appearing in film and television. But Lady Frederick is not a working royal and does not represent the monarch at official engagements. That distinction makes all the difference.
Royal cameos are one thing. A commercial acting career is quite another.
If Meghan accepts a substantial role in The Gentlemen or another production, it would surely put an end to any lingering fantasy that she intends to rejoin the institution as a traditional working duchess.
But—and this is important—rejecting royal duties does not require Meghan to stage a total boycott of pomp and circumstance.
She is still a duchess.
She is still the wife of a prince and the mother of two young royals. If the Sussex family is to spend significant time in Britain, there will almost certainly be important family and national occasions at which their presence would be entirely appropriate.
There may be weddings, funerals, jubilees, coronations, memorial services, diplomatic receptions and grand family celebrations. There may be carefully selected appearances on the balcony or inside Westminster Abbey. There may even be evenings when Meghan opens the jewellery box, chooses a magnificent gown and wears a tiara again.
None of that would make her a working royal.
Attending a royal occasion is not the same as performing royal duties. Appearing beside her husband at an important family ceremony does not mean submitting herself to the Palace diary. Supporting the King at a major national event does not require her to abandon her businesses, productions or acting ambitions.
Meghan does not have to choose between being an entirely private American citizen and returning to the old royal system. There is a considerable amount of territory between those two extremes.
She can live in a beautiful house in the English countryside, take her children to school, appear in a Guy Ritchie production and still arrive at Buckingham Palace looking every inch the Duchess of Sussex when the occasion demands it.
That may be the new Sussex arrangement: no royal duties, no institutional leash and no obligation to perform the role of the dutiful working duchess.
But every so often, when history, family or sheer fabulousness requires it, Meghan may still bring out the diamonds.
Photo by ChatGPT
EDITORIAL SERVICES
Thoughtful, beautifully written blog content for brands, businesses and personal platforms. Enquire about our blogging package: cruisinparis@gmail.com
